<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack&#8217;s rise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/08/jacks-rise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/08/jacks-rise/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beckyp</title>
		<link>http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/08/jacks-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>beckyp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 12:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/09/jacks-rise/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>We've definitely noticed around here that Jack is on the rise. Surprisingly, right now, there is not another "Jack" in his pre-toddler class.  Hopefully he won't be known as "Jack P" his whoe school life.  We had also toyed with the idea of using John Barrett.  "Jackson" is also on the rise (48 in 2004). 

It will be interesting to see if Reba rises to popularity again.  Maybe she'll start a new trend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve definitely noticed around here that Jack is on the rise. Surprisingly, right now, there is not another &#8220;Jack&#8221; in his pre-toddler class.  Hopefully he won&#8217;t be known as &#8220;Jack P&#8221; his whoe school life.  We had also toyed with the idea of using John Barrett.  &#8220;Jackson&#8221; is also on the rise (48 in 2004). </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see if Reba rises to popularity again.  Maybe she&#8217;ll start a new trend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bh admin</title>
		<link>http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/08/jacks-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>bh admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/09/jacks-rise/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>"Nancy", eh? Hmm, I'll check it out, see how it's trending, roll it around, etc. 

As it happens, the name-picking is not pressing at the moment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nancy&#8221;, eh? Hmm, I&#8217;ll check it out, see how it&#8217;s trending, roll it around, etc. </p>
<p>As it happens, the name-picking is not pressing at the moment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nana</title>
		<link>http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/08/jacks-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Nana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 02:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barretthall.net/2006/05/09/jacks-rise/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Nancy is quite underused right now if you are looking for some less popular ones. Thanks for the links - that was fun to check out several different familial names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy is quite underused right now if you are looking for some less popular ones. Thanks for the links - that was fun to check out several different familial names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
